Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcut

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion tools
Policy (log)
Articles (howto · log)
Templates (howto · log)
Categories (howto · log)
Mergers
Page moves
Speedy
All speedy templates
Unfree files
Transwiki (howto · log)
All transwiki templates

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_February_7


February 7

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Tatar dukes and mirzas

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: parent is Nobility in Europe, and I think that this category would be more helpful if it were broadened to all nobility SMasonGarrison 22:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Turkic Christians

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: There was a CFD that decided what Turkic FOO wasn't defining. SMasonGarrison 22:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tatar military personnel of World War I

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge underpopulated category SMasonGarrison 22:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drag Race Belgique contestants

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: No justification to split by season. We already sometimes make an exception to WP:PERFCAT for reality TV series contestants, but compounding that exception by splitting by season is a step too far. Per WP:COPDEF, the specific season is not the WP:DEFINING characteristic (the real defining category per WP:PERFCAT is Category:Reality drag competition contestants). Besides most of the articles are redirects anyway. --woodensuperman 15:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see no reason to nominate additional categories while the American equivalent categories (Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_5#Category:RuPaul's_Drag_Race_contestants Category:RuPaul's Drag Race contestants) are being discussed. If they get merged, these will get merged. If they don't these won't.Naraht (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is different. Part of the argument there is the number of entries. This has five articles between the split category. --woodensuperman 15:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NFL players using CFL infobox

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not sure if this is still in use. I've added a note to the category page in July 2024 and it is still empty. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I was the original creator of this last year, because of a significant problem with some NFL players incorrectly using the CFL infobox due to a fustercluck of past user errors — because the NFL WikiProject had already created its own dedicated NFL infobox to replace the generic "gridiron" infobox, a user incorrectly assumed that all NFL players had already been moved to that infobox (but they hadn't) so that "gridiron" was only on CFL players anymore (but it wasn't), and thus unwisely moved the gridiron box to the CFL title instead of creating a new CFL infobox from scratch.
    The problem is smaller than it was last year, as many of the ones I caught at the time have been fixed, but it does still exist — but I no longer believe that a tracking category that has to be manually added to the articles would be the most effective way of dealing with it, because (a) one would have to notice the article (and know that the category even exists in the first place) in order to add it, and (b) the fact that it's manually added means it might not get removed from the page even after the problem was fixed, as I learned later last year by trying to deal with a similar manually-added maintenance category where considerably more than half of the contents had already been fixed long, long before, and were just never removed from the category when the problem that got them added to it in the first place had been resolved. So maintenance categories like this should really be added by maintenance templates rather than being directly added to articles.
    Again, the problem does still exist, but this hasn't actually been getting used to deal with it, so there's no real point in holding on to it if it's just not actually being utilized. Bearcat (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sects

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge, two definitions of "sect" are provided, I suppose the category was intended for the second definition, but meanwhile it gets mixed up. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@PARAKANYAA and Jc37: pinging contributors to an earlier related discussion about cults. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support but also just deleting it would be fine, though if we want to keep it I take no issue. I've never been sure what to put in this category. Taken literally the first definition would basically be every "heretical" Christian subdivision, or more broadly any smaller split of any religion which would be a nightmare. It's not significantly pejorative anymore but this doesn't seem like a concept conducive to categorization. Seems more consistently used in an Indian context. PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clearly too vague/broad in definition for categorising without some sort of clarifying adjective or disambiguator. No prejudice against the creation of (or manual merging to) Category:Sects (India), as appropriate. - jc37 11:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Endings 1-1499

[edit]
more categories nominated
example of a manual move of an article
more categories nominated
Nominator's rationale: merge, and manually move articles, at least up to the year 1500 this is a redundant category layer with only one or two subcategories (deaths and/or disestablishments). This is follow-up on this earlier discussion.
Note to closer: the previous discussion also contains instructions on how to implement the merge properly.
@Aidan721, LaundryPizza03, Fayenatic london, and Liz: pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films scored by Surojit Cahtterjee

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Match article title Surojit Chatterjee, likely misspelling. Gotitbro (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Distance Education Accreditation Commission

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: I believe we should rename the category Distance Education Accreditation Commission to Distance Education Accrediting Commission. This is the name of the accrediting body itself, and think the original category name, which seems to make sense, was done incorrectly. I raised this on the category talk page, and think raising it here may be better for community input and decisions. Sorry for the problem with the first wikilink, but I could not get it working correctly so linked this as an external link.. FULBERT (talk) 06:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Seiurus

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Seiurus is now a monotypic genus. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Melanopareiidae

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Melanopareiidae is a monogeneric family. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People murdered in Vatican City

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: There have been two people ever murdered in Vatican City (to my knowledge). It was as part of the same incident: the one guy in this category, and his wife. It's the Vatican City. There's what, 700 people there? The victim is himself notable for his position and history it seems a bit foolish to have just the one category when this is all that's ever going to be in here. Though, I'm not actually sure about how these categories work, so maybe it's OK to have this kind of category with only one member? I am unsure. If I am wrong apologies. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Trinidad State Trojans football coaches

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The Trinidad football program was discontinued in 1971 when the school's sports teams were still most commonly called "Trinidad" not "Trinidad State"; see https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-daily-sentinel/164887068/. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Economists by country and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer. upmerge for now SMasonGarrison 05:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the Saltbush Club

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Appears to violate WP:PEOPLECAT as a rather trivial, obscure WP:NONDEFINING aspect (see also WP:BLPCAT). The club has no Wikipedia article, and mention in the articles of the people included appears to be brief and unremarkable, regardless of the club's reputation. Per WP:DEFINING: A defining characteristic is one that reliable sources commonly and consistently refer to in describing the topic. This does not appear to hold true to any of the 'members'. We don't make categories merely to satisfy an urge to categorize things. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Integrated Resorts

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERLAPCAT. Casino hotel is the main topic. Overlapping topics. Rename to "Casino hotels...". –Aidan721 (talk) 03:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of speedy nomination
  • For the top category: merge or reverse merge, I do not know what the best terminology is but I checked a number of articles and they were all about a hotel including a casino. The subcategories should follow the top category in accordance with the merge direction. Also decapitalize to "integrated resorts" if that name is kept. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or Reverse Merge, per Marcocapelle - Not sure either, but we obviously don't need both trees per WP:OVERLAPCAT. - jc37 11:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • An integrated resort is more than simply a casino resort. There is a difference between the two. An integrated resort features hotel space, a casino, convention space, dining, shopping and entertainment. A casino resort simply needs to only include hotel space and a casino. An integrated resort is a type of casino resort, but it is more than just a casino resort. Working in the industry myself, I can affirm that there is a difference between these two terms. --NevadaExpert (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afghan footballers by populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer. Only 1 subcategory. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/Today&oldid=931652817"